Tag Archives: Celtic

New Models

Bad habit: I read the last few pages of Diana Butler Bass’s new book, Christianity After Religion, recently while sitting in a bookstore.  Good news:  it was good so I’ll read the rest.

Just from my brief reading, I was reminded of the Celtic model of evangelism that I outlined in an earlier post. That model for evangelism was:

  • Fellowship,
  • Ministry and Conversations
  • Belief & Invitation to Commitment.

Butler Bass talks about a new model for the church of “belonging, behaving and believing.”  Which, I believe, corresponds to the Celtic model above:

  • Belonging=Fellowship
  • Behaving=Ministry and Conversations
  • Believing=Belief and Invitation to Commitment.

What might this  model look like in a local congregation?  This is what we do at the Episcopal church where I work so I’ll describe that for you.  We work hard to engage visitors/newcomers in on-going conversation about who we are and who they are. Storytelling.  Clergy and staff follow up with phone calls and emails; we take them out for coffee or lunch; other parishioners visit them; we are intentional about talking to them on Sunday morning; we ask them to help in small ways with programs and events.  We invite, engage, share.

Behaving or ministry and conversations as Butler Bass terms it is just more of the same.  We’re more intentional about inviting and involvement; we pair them with a mentor in the parish; we connect them with small groups and get them involved. If they have children, we work to incorporate the children into events, programs and classes.

As a last step, or sometimes in the midst of the first two steps depending on the person, we ask if they are interested in formal membership.  Many say “yes”; some say “not yet”.  I haven’t kept any hard data, but I find that the more involved the person was with a church in  the past, the longer it takes them to make a formal commitment of membership to our church.  It is hard to let go of the past often.  That’s okay.    But in the transition  time, we consider them members of our church.  And we respect them enough to expect something of them.    We expect them to be involved in worship and programs and give of their time and talents, and we expect them to give financially.  When I say to these folks that we have expectations of them just as they have of us, I have never had anyone get angry or refuse.  Isn’t that kind of amazing?  Why?  I think it is because they are by then part of the community – they have become connected to us just as we have to them. They have become connected to our story – the Christian story as well as the story of who we are at that particular church.

St. Patrick  might have said that he and his missionaries were learning about the culture and the lives of the people before asking for a commitment.  I would say that today we should be doing the same – engaging people in worship, fellowship and ministries all while telling the story of who we are as Christians and helping them to find where they can fit into that.  And out of that we all walk into greater commitment to God, the church and each other.

Evangelism:  it’s radical hospitality.  Inviting, engaging and incorporating.

The Celtic Way of Evangelism

Most of my vocational work in the Episcopal Church has been in Christian Formation and Education.  It is still one of my passions.  I learned early on that there two important elements: story and relationships.  They’re connected.

We have to tell and learn God’s story.  We have to tell our own story.  We have to listen to the stories of others.  If you were to draw these as three circles, it is the intersection of the three circles where we meet and connect with God, ourselves and each other.

Church is about these relationships, I believe.

So, I was excited when many years ago I first read “The Celtic Way of Evangelism” by George G. Hunter III.  If you haven’t read it… well…DO IT!

I’m sure I’ll be quoting from this book, and his later ones, as this blog grows, but for this first post here is what I want us to see.

The phenomenal growth of the church in Ireland under Patrick followed this model:

Fellowship:  Patrick and his band of followers moved into a community and established relationships.  For us today, this would be to bring people into the fellowship of our communities of faith.

Ministry and Conversations:  Within this fellowship, and the growing relationships you engage people in conversation (stories), ministry (working together), prayer and worship.

Belief and Invitation to Commitment:  In time, they discover what they believe and what the community believes and they are invited to commit through membership and/or sacrament.

The Roman model, on the other hand, which was used in England and is still used by most of us today is:

Presentation: the Christian message, and that of the particular denomination  is presented to the newcomer.

Decision: They are asked to decide to believe in Christ and become Christians (and Episcopalians, Methodists…)

Fellowship: IF they have decided positively, then they are invited into fellowship and ministry with the community.

Do you see the difference? Now granted, many of our churches these days are probably a mix of these methods.  But are we focusing on relationships enough at the beginning?  Are we inviting people into the community by inviting them to participate in various ministries?  Do we take newcomers to coffee or lunch to get to know them better?  Do we invite them to  dinners and work days?  Are we meeting them where they are or just expecting them to figure us out?

Trying to get involved and be a member of a church is like trying to jump on a moving train. It’s hard.  Most people give up.

How are we extending a hand to those on the platform?